Dear Sister,
For the message you recently sent me I am downright grateful.. It was encouraging. I pray that you will find this empowering.
Regarding women preaching, youâre correct, the current quake finds its epicenter in Beth Mooreâs tweet that she would be preaching on Motherâs Day (reportedly at North Point Church where Andy Stanley is). On the heels of this, was news of her invitation to Truett Seminary for their âNational Preaching Conferenceâ, being listed as a âGuest Preacher.â Many have been supportive of Moore, even out of reformed camps.
Frankly, Iâm glad the cat is out of the bag and that she isnât pretending to do anything otherwise than preach. Sheâs been flying under the radar for far too long. Calling a missile a bird might fool some, but now there is no excuse. Will we stand on the side of Biblical orthodoxy or join those attacking it?
Additionally, I would add that my biggest concern with Moore isnât that she is a woman. She would be disqualified if she were a man. Mysticism, emotionalism, and poor exegesis permeate her teaching. You mentioned your past experience in the heretical Word of Faith movement and how this all sounds eerily familiar. I believe the Charismatic movement has been subtly making major inroads in Baptist circles for decades (i.e. the soft prosperity of The Prayer of Jabez). We came to a fork in the road way back and chose the wrong path. This is just the latest incident demonstrating that we havenât turned around. Another disconcerting mark of her teaching noted way back was the use of word studies to find the broad semantic range of a word as leverage for eisegesis, that is, reading her desired meaning into a text. I donât think Mooreâs intent is to be unfaithful to the text, but that is the result.
Regarding the trajectory of the denomination, my biggest concern is how deeply this is tied to feminism, #MeToo, cultural marxism, and intersectionality as driving forces in the culture. The current is strong, and Iâm afraid weâre not acting like salmon anymore. I agree, we need to hate all evil acts of abuse, but when you use the devilâs tools to destroy the devilâs works, you need to know youâre just playing around in his toolshed. Weâve come to another fork, and I think the disaster is going to be more severe. If at first fork we chose a path leading to false teaching, we’re now pondering one that leads to apostasy.
Yes, historically it has always been the orthodox belief that the office of elder is limited to qualified men. The main âBiblicalâ argument for including women is to recall the small number of prophetesses we find in the Scriptures. While there obviously are female prophets, we never find a woman who is âking.â Though Athaliah makes a run as queen and Jezebel is essentially pulling all the strings, these are not exactly positive role models. Nor do we find women acting as priests. The function of teaching is tied to the priests and Levites more than the prophets. The prophets preeminently spoke Godâs word, rather than teach it. Also, in this vein, when Paul gives instructions concerning women prophesying in the New Testament, she is to do so manifesting that she is under a head, (cf. 1 Corinthians 11:2â16). This connects to Paulâs prohibition of a woman teaching men or exercising authority over a man in the church (1 Timothy 2:12).
The novel spin being put on 1 Timothy 2:12 today, making room for women preachers, is that it should be read as a hendiadys, that is, two words joined by a conjunction to express a single idea. If what was banned was a woman âteaching and exercising authority over a manâ as a single idea, then a woman could be permitted to exercise the function of an elder, teaching, while being denied the office. This is what some are calling âsoft complementarianism.â I think itâs rather a hardened compromise.
But this anticipates the question you asked, what of those men who teach in the assembly who are not elders? While itâs understandable that the question arises, as it is deployed by opponents of the Biblical view, it is a smoke screen. When a non-elder preaches he isnât violating any prohibition. Let me demonstrate with a question. How is one to know if a man is qualified when one of those qualifications is being âapt to teachâ if he is never able to teach until he is an elder?
Truly, all teaching in the church should be under the elderâs oversight, as part of his promoting truth and guarding against false teaching. When the elders permit a woman to preach, then automatically, in the very act, they and the woman involved have already violated the Scriptures, however orthodox the sermon may be.
I thank God for your recognizing the rightness and goodness of Godâs order and recognizing the lies of the world and your desire to mortify them as they seek to take root in your own heart. âFeminismâ is a peculiar word for that which is an attack on the feminine, saying that if womanhood is to have any value, it must be equivalent to manhood. Iâll allow Douglas Wilson to colorfully reiterate the point: âIronically, we call this attempt by some women to be more like men âfeminism,â which is a bit like calling an attempt by cats to be like dogs felinism.â And thus we have already tilted the hat to gender confusion in the church.
In reply to the accusation of belittling women, I believe the Biblical view bebigs them. Womanhood, motherhood, and sisterhood are glorious things in which women are immeasurably superior to men. Chesterton nailed the disparity when he said, âNothing can ever overcome that one enormous sex superiority, that even the male child is born closer to his mother than to his father. No one, staring at that frightful female privilege, can quite believe in the equality of the sexes.â Equal in value, dignity and worth? Certainly. In roles? Heaven forbid!
Yes, the serpent is whispering in Eveâs ear again as you suggest, and the blame still lies with Adam, but at least in the Garden his sin was one of passivity. Now he is actively inciting his wife with snakeâs crafty lies. âBecome like me, and youâll be like God.â
Dear sister, I thank God that you are feeding on that which is far more nourishing and empowering, the Word of truth.