[W]e must not begin to question our relationship to the world’s first man, Adam, because every time you put the question I will make you ask the same question about our relationship to the Lord Jesus Christ. If you say to me, ‘Is it fair that the sin of Adam should be imputed to me?’ I will reply by asking, ‘Is it fair that the righteousness of Christ should be imputed to you?’ – D. Martyn Lloyd-Jones, Romans Vol. 4, p. 219
I’m having a really hard time reconciling the idea that Adam’s sin is imputed to us with Ezekiel 18. Any thoughts?
LikeLike
Here is my run at it:
1. Adam and Christ are in a unique position as the only representational heads of the humanity. God has assigned this to no one else. To look for imputation in Ezekiel is then incorrect since the fathers here were not federal heads representing their sons.
2. Although we inherit Adam’s quilt we are primarily held responsible for our own sins. We have a conscience that convicts us of this quilt and we repress it and sin against the work of the law written on our hearts.
3. There is a sense in which we are judged for the sins of our fathers.
As I read these scriptures and try to place them in their context and interpret the according the analogy of faith I believe that earthly fathers deeply influence their sons, such that they are the “generation of those who hate him”. In this way the fathers condemn their sons. If my biological father functions in this way it makes sense that Adam would do so in a greater more profound way.
LikeLike