No matter how well we speak of Jesus as a pattern we have done nothing unless we point him out as the substitute and sinbearer. – C.H. Spurgeon in Death for Sin, and Death to Sin
He himself dying while he made our sins to die; Himself crucified while He crucified our sins once for all. – C.H. Spurgeon in Death for Sin, and Death to Sin
What looked like (and indeed was) the defeat of goodness by evil is also, and more certainly, the defeat of evil by goodness. Overcome there, He was himself overcoming. Crushed by the ruthless power of Rome, He was Himself crushing the serpent’s head (Gen 3:15). The victim was the victor, and the cross is still the throne from which He rules the world. – John R.W. Stott in The Cross of Christ
Isaiah 54 & “Ken Lee”
As one journeys out of Isaiah 53 into Isaiah 54 a song should be birthed. In fact, we are commanded to sing, and not just sing, but to break forth into singing. This breaking forth is not a cute, pretty little song in our hearts either; we are to cry aloud or wail this song.
Is your singing properly birthed? Does it flow from properly thinking about the glorious salvation wrought by the mighty arm of God? When you read rich theological content does it stir your heart as you reflect and meditate on it causing you to go musical? When you sing is it the atmosphere and the music that excite you or the precious truths about which you are singing?
(Thanks for the video Dbro)
[youtube.com/watch?v=FQt-h753jHI]Enjoy your spiritual food.
Here is the quote David passed along to me that I shared last night. Don’t scarf…savor.
Remember, it is not hasty reading, but serious meditating upon holy and heavenly truths, that make them prove sweet and profitable to the soul. It is not the bee’s touching of the flower that gathers honey, but her abiding for a time upon the flower that draws out the sweet. It is not he that reads most, but he that meditates most, that will prove the choicest, sweetest, wisest, and strongest Christian. – Thomas Brooks
HT: Challies
God-centered?
What does it mean? John Piper gives a good definition.
Isaiah 52:13-53:12 or I Rammed the Car Door into My Head!
I was at Wal-Mart, serving you, buying the little electronic game that so entertained you last night. (BTW: How do you pronounce “corps” Danielle?) My allergies were killing me and my wits were numb; hey, that’s as good of an excuse as I can conjure up. You know how the Taurus only unlocks from the passenger side; so I took the laborious venture to the other side of the car, exhausted I flung the door open to place your goodies in the passenger seat and rammed the door into my forehead.
Unfortunately the stupidity didn’t start there. Immediately I thought, “Well, at least it makes me look tough, like I got into a fight.” “I can walk around with a smirk on my face that make others think the other guy must be even more messed up.” Only my prideful depravity could take my stupidity and human fragility and turn it into a reason for boasting.
Again, unfortunately this is not the end or ultimate demonstration of my depravity. No, that is more clearly seen when I try to make the cross an echo of my worth. I like to think God really got a bargain when he ransomed me. I’m special like that, what would he do without me? Foolishness. The cross of Christ shows me the depths of my sin and I want to twist it such that it glorifies me? I would gladly suffer from intense klutziness than this kind of stupidity.
I am an ungrateful, prideful, arrogant, selfish sinner. God grant me eyes to see the depths of my sin so that I might better know and be constrained by the fathoms of your glorious grace and mercy.
Isaiah 52:1-12 & Gone?
I picked my three favorite photos. One has his tiny little fingers wrapped around her thumb; it looks as if he is really clinching it. His precious little face takes up the majority of the second picture. The third is the two most precious faces I know by earthly sight pressed together in sorrow and love. I had them printed 11×14 in sepia tone. Then I placed them in three simple little white frames which I hung at the top of the stairway around noon. I knew she would be home around 3pm. I hear the garage door. We talk about the day in the dining room, she ascends the stairs. “Why are the stairway lights on?” she thinks to herself…oblivious. I wait. As she descends she notices, by her reaction I know I have done well. I love making her happy. Some things can leave us, and we never notice them. A huge wrought iron piece that previously occupied that space in the hallway was not missed. If the picture were removed I think Bethany would instantly notice. If you treasure something, really treasure something, you will quickly realize its absence. Bethany so treasures Elijah; his absence hurts.
The return of the Lord to Zion (v. 8) was occasioned by singing. God’s presence among them was their deepest joy. Could God be absent and our souls comfortable? Are they? Or do we like the Psalmist “seek His presence continually” (Psalm 105:4), pant after him as the deer pants for water (Psalm 42:1), and desire above all to “dwell in the house of the LORD all the days of my life, to gaze upon the beauty of the LORD and to inquire in his temple” (Psalm 27:4)?
The Cross is the Crux
That I might preach error is a terror to me, a terror I rejoice to carry with me into the study. I pray daily that I not stray into error, and thank God that I do so, believing it to be some of the good He brought out of my bad. I praise God that a movement that once looked so attractive to me now deeply saddens me. I am speaking of the emergent conversation. If you are clueless, good for you, but if you have ever wondered about Brian McLaren, Tony Jones, Doug Pagitt, Rob Bell, Donald Miller, Spencer Burke, or Dan Kimball I highly recommend you read Why We’re Not Emergent by Kevin DeYoung and Ted Kluck. If you were going to read a book on the emerging church, read this one. Here is a sampling:
This is maybe the biggest difference between emergent Christianity and historic evangelical Christianity. Being a Christian – for Burke, for McLaren, for Bell, for Jones, and for many others in the emerging conversation – is less about faith in the person and work of Jesus Christ as the only access to God the Father and the only atonement for sins before a wrathful God, and more about living a life that Jesus lived and walking in His way.
Remember spoiling the gospel?
Isaiah 50:4-11 & the Person of Christ
I ask your forgiveness that a subject so precious was treated so lightly last night. The doctrine of the person of Christ is a treasure, preserved and fought for by the early church. My words were too brief and not precise enough and my diagram lacking. Much of what I will say is taken from Grudem’s Systematic Theology. It has some helpful figures that I will present to you the next time we meet, for now words must suffice.
Grudem gives three inadequate views of the person of Christ:
1) Apollinarianism – This view teaches that Christ had a human body but not a human spirit or mind; that the spirit and mind were from His divine nature. One problem with this is that Jesus would only be a fit redeemer for our body but not our soul and mind which equally need redemption.
2) Nestorianism – Teaches that Christ was two separate persons. This would make Christ a “they” and not a “He”. If you don’t understand this mess or why someone would hold to it – you are not alone.
3) Monophysitism (Eutychianism) – This view teaches that Christ had just one nature. Its like the divine nature and human nature were traveling toward each other at light speed, collided, and a new third nature was all that was left, such that Jesus was not fully human nor fully divine but brand x. Because Jesus is not fully man he is not the perfect substitute or high priest who was tempted in every way we were yet without sin. Nor is He truly God rendering Him incapable of earning our salvation. Mono creates a mut Jesus who cannot save.
Finally Grudem brings us to Chalcedonian Definition as the orthodox statement of the biblical teaching on the person of Christ. The statement is:
We, then, following the holy Fathers, all with one consent, teach men to confess one and the same Son, our Lord Jesus Christ, the same perfect in Godhead and also perfect in manhood; truly God and truly man, of a reasonable [rational] soul and body; consubstantial (coessential) with the Father according to the Godhead, and consubstantial with us according to the Manhood; in all things like unto us, without sin; begotten before all ages of the Father according to the Godhead, and in these latter days, for us and for our salvation, born of the Virgin Mary, the Mother of God, according to the Manhood; one and the same Christ, Son, Lord, Only-begotten, to be acknowledged in two natures, inconfusedly, unchangeably, indivisibly, inseparably; the distinction of natures being by no means taken away by the union, but rather the property of each nature being preserved and concurring in one Person and one Subsistence, not parted or divided into two persons, but one and the same Son, and only begotten, God, the Word, the Lord Jesus Christ, as the prophets from the beginning [have declared] concerning him, and the Lord Jesus Christ himself has taught us, and the Creed of the holy Fathers has been handed down to us.
The two natures, human and divine are united in Christ so that He is one person but yet each nature remains truly human and truly divine. His divine nature is exactly the same as the Father, and His human nature is exactly like ours excepting sin. Grudem goes on to explain that “one nature does some things that the other nature does not do” and yet “everything either nature does the Person of Christ does”.
Finally two statements that help me greatly are: 1) Remaining what he was, he became what he was not. 2) This excerpt from the The Athanasian Creed:
33. Equal to the Father, as touching his Godhead; and inferior to the Father, as touching his Manhood.
34. Who although he be [is] God and Man, yet he is not two, but one Christ;
35. One, not by conversion of the Godhead into flesh, but by taking assumption of the Manhood into God;
36. One altogether, not by confusion of Substance [Essence], but by unity of Person.
37. For as the reasonable soul and flesh is one man, so God and Man is one Christ
Solus Christus
The Lamb and Unicorn
A little lamb was born all wooly-white with skinny legs and a wet nose, pretty much like all the other little lambs. But as the lamb grew into a sheep, the other sheep began to notice a difference. This sheep had a strange lump on his forehead. At first they thought he’d been hit, but the lump never went down. Instead, a large pad of deep, white wool grew over the lump and made it very soft and firm. And even that might have stopped attracting attention except for the fact that this sheep began to use the lump on his head in very strange ways. For one thing, the lump seemed to weigh down his head so that he always looked like he was bowing and showing reverence to some invisible king. Then he began to seek out other sheep that were sick or wounded. He would use the firm, soft lump on his forehead to help the weak onto their feet and to wipe away tears.
Whole flocks of sheep started to follow him around, but the goats laughed him to scorn. Sheep were disgusting enough, but a sheep with a queer lump on his forehead was more than they could take. They harassed him all the time and made up jokes and taunts: “How come you hang your wooly head? Your lump made out of woolen lead?” And it just infuriated them that he would walk away from them and keep on doing his quiet works of mercy.
So one day the goats surrounded him and rammed him with their horns until he died, and they left him alone in the field. But as he lay there something very strange happened. He began to get bigger. The bloody wool fell away and revealed a sleek, white, horse-like hair. The soft pad of deep white wool dropped off his forehead and straight out of the merciful lump grew a mighty horn of crimson steel unlike any horn that has ever been or will be again. And then as if by command the massive Unicorn leaped to his feet. His back stood eight feet above the ground. The muscles in his shoulders and neck were like marble. The tendons in his legs were like cables of iron. His head was no longer bowed, and when he looked to the right or to the left, the crimson horn slashed the air like a saber dipped in blood.
When the sheep saw him, they fell down and worshiped. He bowed and touched each one on the forehead with the tip of his horn, whispered something in their ear, and soared away into the sky and hasn’t been seen since.
Do you remember the last meeting between the magnificent Unicorn and the worshiping sheep? He bowed and touched each one on the forehead and whispered something special in their ear. This is what he said:
I touch you with my crimson horn,
And raise my lump upon your head
To signify you are new-born
With power that raised me from the dead.
I send you now as I was sent
To fan the wick and heal the reed,
Take mercy to the world’s extent
And you will reign with me indeed.
From The Spirit is Upon Him Gentle for Now by John Piper
Sermon Quotes from The Bruised Reed
Injustice is more than a political dysfunction. It is a spiritual evil, a denial of God. And by now the mess we’ve made is so far advanced, so systemic, so overwhelming, its beyond our correction. – Ray Ortlund Sr., Isaiah: God Saves Sinners
Wesley and Whitefield may preach better than I can, but they cannot preach a better gospel. – C.H. Spurgeon
There was no abasement ever so deep as Christ’s was, in a double regard. First, None ever went so low as he, for he suffered the wrath of God, and bore upon him the sins of us all; none was ever so low. And then in another respect his abasement was greatest because He descended from the highest top of glory; and for Him to be man, to be a servant, to be a curse, to suffer the wrath of god, to be the lowest of all – Lord, wither doest Thou descend? – Richard Sibbes, The Bruised Reed
Shall God be abased and man proud? – Richard Sibbes, The Bruised Reed
There is more mercy in Christ than sin in us. – Richard Sibbes, The Bruised Reed